<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Large Language Models | Samuele Punzo</title><link>https://samuelepunzo.github.io/tags/large-language-models/</link><atom:link href="https://samuelepunzo.github.io/tags/large-language-models/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><description>Large Language Models</description><generator>HugoBlox Kit (https://hugoblox.com)</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Is my model perplexed for the right reason? Contrasting LLMs' Benchmark Behavior with Token-Level Perplexity</title><link>https://samuelepunzo.github.io/publications/ppl_metric/</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://samuelepunzo.github.io/publications/ppl_metric/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;This paper introduces a simple, principled interpretability framework based on &lt;strong&gt;token-level perplexity&lt;/strong&gt; to test whether LLMs rely on linguistically relevant cues when solving benchmarks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Key contributions:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;A hypothesis-driven analysis method using perplexity distributions over minimal sentence pairs&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;No reliance on unstable feature-attribution techniques&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Experiments on controlled linguistic benchmarks with several open-weight LLMs&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Evidence that linguistically important tokens influence but never fully explain model behavior, revealing reliance on non-linguistic heuristics&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>